Wide lenses cause distortion, and other photography myths busted

Mar 4, 2024

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Wide lenses cause distortion, and other photography myths busted

Mar 4, 2024

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Join the Discussion

Share on:

YouTube video

I’ve always been of the belief that it’s important to be accurate when it comes to discussing the technicalities of photography. That includes using the right terms and knowing what you’re talking about. Shouldn’t there be some kind of minimum standard?

I know that all sounds very elitist and gate-keepery of me, but apparently, I’m not alone. That opinion is also shared by photographer Tyler Stalman.

Wide Lenses Cause Distortion

This is one of the more interesting myths. There are, obviously, lens aberrations that cause distortions such as barrel or pincushion. However, wide-angle lenses don’t inherently distort reality. Inversely, long focal lengths don’t cause “compression”.

I’ll let you watch the video above to understand why, and yes there are caveats, but in short, it’s how far away from stuff we are that determines perspective.

It’s a misunderstanding in photography that’s been tackled before. Several times. Also, yes, cropping and zooming are effectively the same thing, optically speaking. The only difference is you’re losing resolution when you crop.

Not the only controversial one

Tyler touches on a few other potentially controversial topics in his video. Are tripods really an essential photography tool? Do you actually understand what people mean by “colour science”? And is it really unprofessional to use flash?

There are a lot of myths discussed in this video, although the majority of the time is spent on the wide-angle lens debate. These aren’t the only photography myths out there, though. What photography myths do you always see people getting wrong?

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

John Aldred

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 responses to “Wide lenses cause distortion, and other photography myths busted”

  1. Michael David Chastain Avatar
    Michael David Chastain

    Meh. This is an argument of semantics, and not very interesting. Yes, it’s the distance from the subject that determines perspective. But the focal length of my lens is generally going to dictate how far away from the subject I need to be, or vice versa. I feel like such pedantry is just a way to feel superior to others, without really adding anything to the conversation, and when we all know exactly what is meant by terms like lens “compression”.

    1. Robin Gordon Avatar
      Robin Gordon

      the much more interesting discussion is about flash. it’s an artifact of a time when light sources were difficult to manipulate. now you can get 25ft rolls of RGB leds for $30, a controller for $10, a couple spare cell phone charger plugs, and you have customizable static lighting. or go buy the expensive photography grade static lighting, but raw white flash is bad. it’s like throwing a bucket of white paint over whatever you’re taking a photo of. you lose all the detail, contrast and hues you spend thousands of dollars on lenses to get. blows my mind every time I see photographers prefer flash in a club or music venue at night, instead of just learning how to take freehand photos in low light. even with IBS and pixel shift and multiple exposure stitching going on in modern cameras, I still see them using their flash guns. I dunno, I can’t understand them haha.

  2. Robin Gordon Avatar
    Robin Gordon

    oh I’ve got a whole list of them. misconceptions, but more fun is trying to turn some of the sacred cows from the film era into hamburgers. sunny 16 should never be mentioned to anyone holding a digital camera, ever. “f8 and be there is dumb too. it’s primarily because they were terrible at manual focus back then. f8 means you can be 1/4 rotation off on focus and still get something to print in a newspaper. and yeah, the second entry level film cameras got their integrated light meters, photography fundamentally changed, and anyone who couldn’t figure that out, shouldn’t be giving advice to others.