Nikon’s 58mm f/0.95 looks more like an appendage-waving proof of concept than a lens they expect people to use

Mar 7, 2019

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Nikon’s 58mm f/0.95 looks more like an appendage-waving proof of concept than a lens they expect people to use

Mar 7, 2019

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Join the Discussion

Share on:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4mRO39CyU0

There hasn’t been all that much information released on the Nikon Z 58mm f/0.95 S Noct lens. We know that it’s 58mm, that it’s f/0.95 and manual focus, and we believe that it’s going to cost approximately $6,000. The lens is expected to be released at some point this year, but beyond that, there’s not really much to go on.

But Nikon had one on display att CP+ 2019, and Matt Granger got the chance to have a bit of a play with one. In this video, he lets us know his thoughts, and I have to say, for a lens that’s so expensive, it seems fairly useless. Created simply as a proof of concept more than a lens they actually expect people to buy in order to flex their muscles for the competition.

Matt also takes a hands-on look at the 24-70mm f/2.8 S and 14-30mm f/4 S coming out this year. About those, he notes that the 14-30mm f/4 doesn’t feel quite as well built as some of Nikon’s higher-end lenses, despite having a price tag of $1,300. He said that it doesn’t feel “bad”, but it certainly doesn’t feel like a premium quality lens. The 70-200mm f/2.8, though, he says, feels very good, although he still doesn’t put it at quite the build quality level of the F mount Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR for DSLRs.

When it came to the Nikon Z 58mm f/0.95 S Noct, Matt observed people trying out the lens before him struggling to use the thing, even with very solid tripods. The depth of field is so thin at f/0.95, that the slightest movement from you or your subject quickly throws things out of focus. And if you’re trying to follow a moving subject, forget it.

And the focus throw on this lens is just ridiculous, it’s even more than most cinema lenses, covering almost 360 degrees of rotation from 0.5 metres up to infinity. So, if your subject does go out of focus, you could be winding that thing around for a while to try and catch up to them.

The lens has a relatively small 82mm filter thread on the front, which is quite surprising. I would’ve expected a lens this large and with this wide of an aperture to be something similar to the Sigma 105mm f/1.4, which has an insanely huge 105mm filter thread. But, no, 82mm. It also has a tripod collar with a small foot underneath. It doesn’t appear to be Arca Swiss profiled, though, which is unfortunate.

Even for manual focus ninjas, this is going to be a very tough lens to use by the looks of it. And for 6 grand, you’re probably going to want to have a good play with it first before putting your money down.

Given Leica’s claims, and then Sony’s recent muscle-flexing citing possible f/0.63 E Mount lenses, now the reality of the 58mm f/0.95 usability (albeit in a show environment), this little muscle-flexing competition could get quite entertaining.

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

John Aldred

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 20 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 responses to “Nikon’s 58mm f/0.95 looks more like an appendage-waving proof of concept than a lens they expect people to use”

  1. Viggo Næss Avatar
    Viggo Næss

    Wow, how useless ??

    1. Viggo Næss Avatar
      Viggo Næss

      Vilhelm, please show me?? and did you think a 20 lbs MF 0.95 lens with 350 degree throw at 6000 dollars was useful?

    2. Viggo Næss Avatar
      Viggo Næss

      Vilhelm, did you see my name there? You know nothing, please stop assuming anything, it makes you look like a d!ck…

  2. pieter van der walt Avatar
    pieter van der walt

    The Metikon speedmaster f0.95 50mm manual focus has been out for what – mayby 4 years ? Sure its Chinese made , although it’s super sharp and $850 , this is where reality meets hype . Honestly as a long time Nikon user I want them to succeed , dont we all? Competition is good for the consumer but at this rate I wonder if they will be around in 10 years or less. Just so out of touch with the consumer , have they got a strategy department ? They bring out two well built bodies but limited glass , and the two bodies they have can’t even focus well with adapted f mount . And then they bring out a un practical over price lens ? Wtf

  3. Max Avatar
    Max

    If the DOF is too thin, just move back a little, or make the opening a little smaller :)

  4. RobertVS Avatar
    RobertVS

    This must qualify as a Guinness World Record in the category of unprofessional reviews. The reviewer is surprised that

    – on a 35mm frame a 58mm f/0.95 lens has VERY shallow depth of field (comes as a surprise to the reviewer who compares it to a 14-30mm superwide)
    – due to the shallow depth of field the focus throw is almost 360° which is “bad” (In reality, this is very good news for us who actually know how to use a lens like this)
    – a mirror 35mm Sigma 105mm f/1.4 lens has different filter size than a mirrorless 58/0.95 (can you google “register distance”???)
    – it’s too expensive for the reviewer (well 6k is a lot for a click-w***e but not for someone who uses it to make a living)
    – it’s too heavy to use (give me a break, have you ever tried medium format digital?)
    – pay-off: reviewer compares it to vaporware. Nice – how low can you actually go? THIS LOW!

  5. президент Putin Avatar
    президент Putin

    I always thought that Matt Granger was a bad “reviewer”. This video confirms it again.

    I’m not an hater of him, (i personally like a few of his pics).

    This review shows me some “boring” things again.

  6. David Addams Avatar
    David Addams

    On the focus throw:

    I have an old manual focus lens that has a focus throw approaching 350 degrees.

    It’s one of my favorite lenses.